San Francisco

Driving

Replacing a gasoline car with an electric vehicle charged at home.

Annual running cost, three ways

Driving: annual energy cost

Replacing a gasoline car with an electric vehicle charged at home.

Driving: annual energy cost — estimated annual energy cost by scenario
ScenarioEstimated annual cost
Today — gasoline car $2,279/yr
Electric, on PG&E E-ELEC $986/yr
Electric, on your own solar $0/yr

Assumes one car driven 10,535 miles a year — the California average — replacing a vehicle that achieves the in-use fleet average of 25.6 mpg rather than a new-car sticker figure, and charged at home. No age is assumed for the car, because none is needed: 25.6 mpg is what the fleet on the road actually achieves across every vintage in it, which is a measured figure and a better answer than a vintage we would have had to guess. Public fast charging costs considerably more than home charging and is not modelled here.

E-ELEC Assumes overnight home charging on off-peak hours. This is the single easiest load to shift — nearly every EV and home charger can be scheduled — but it does have to be scheduled, and charging during the 4-9pm peak costs substantially more.

Solar $0 is the marginal cost of solar you generate and use yourself. It is not system payback, and it is not the export credit value of power you send back to the grid.

How we calculated this →

How we built this number

Nothing above is a headline figure we were handed. It is derived, step by step, from a stated consumption assumption and a stated efficiency, both of which are published with their sources. If you disagree with an input, you can see exactly which one to argue with.

The arithmetic

  1. 10535 miles/yr driven
  2. / 25.6 mpg fleet average = 412 gallons/yr of gasoline
  3. / 3.3 miles per kWh = 3192 kWh/yr of electricity
Fuel used today
412 gallons
Cost of that fuel
$2,279
Electricity instead
3,192 kWh
Cost on E-ELEC
$986
Annual difference
$1,293

The consumption assumption

Assumes one car driven 10,535 miles a year — the California average — replacing a vehicle that achieves the in-use fleet average of 25.6 mpg rather than a new-car sticker figure, and charged at home. No age is assumed for the car, because none is needed: 25.6 mpg is what the fleet on the road actually achieves across every vintage in it, which is a measured figure and a better answer than a vintage we would have had to guess. Public fast charging costs considerably more than home charging and is not modelled here.

The rates we priced it at

Both sides of this comparison are priced at published rates, effective 2026-06-01: a PG&E residential fuel rate on the old equipment, and PG&E's E-ELEC electricity rate on the new. The exact figures, what they include, where they came from and when they were last checked are all on the methodology page. Rates move, and when they do, every number on this site moves with them.

The time-of-use caveat

E-ELEC is a time-of-use rate, not a flat price. Assumes overnight home charging on off-peak hours. This is the single easiest load to shift — nearly every EV and home charger can be scheduled — but it does have to be scheduled, and charging during the 4-9pm peak costs substantially more.

This matters more than most people expect. The same appliance on the same rate plan can cost substantially more or less depending purely on the hour it runs, which is why we state the assumption rather than quietly averaging it away.

Why it costs less to run

A gasoline engine throws away most of the energy in a gallon of fuel as heat; an electric motor puts nearly all of it into moving the car. Charged at home overnight, the same journey costs a fraction of what it costs on gasoline. The saving here is larger than either home upgrade for most households, simply because driving is where most people burn the most fuel.

What it is like to live with

For a household with a driveway or garage, the meaningful change is that fuelling stops being an errand — the car charges overnight and starts every morning full. Without off-street parking that maths changes substantially, and public charging is expensive enough to erode much of the saving. That is a real limitation in San Francisco, and one we would rather tell you about up front.

What it changes beyond the bill

Tailpipe emissions are concentrated exactly where people live and walk, and are linked to respiratory and cardiovascular harm in the neighbourhoods they pass through. An EV moves that emission off the street entirely, and onto a grid that keeps getting cleaner.

What we do not cover: your electrical panel

Running cost is only half the question. The other half is whether your existing electrical service has the capacity to take the new equipment — because if it does not, a panel upgrade can cost more than the appliance that triggered it, and take considerably longer to arrange.

We do not answer that, here or in a report. This site used to promise a load calculation against your panel and it was never built; it would also need a photo of the inside of your panel, which is not on the list of things the privacy policy says we collect — and that list changes before the product does, not after.

So every upfront cost we publish assumes no electrical panel upgrade and no major duct replacement. On an older house that is the assumption most likely to be wrong, either one can add thousands, and it is the first thing worth asking a contractor about.

Now do it with your numbers

This page describes an average San Francisco home. A personal analysis rebuilds the same comparison from your postcode, the equipment you have today and how far you drive, and tells you what the change would cost upfront as well as what it would save. The form asks which upgrades you want costed, and if you came here for Driving, that is the one to tick. We can do this across Pacific Gas & Electric territory — 1,227 of California’s 2,654 postcodes.

Generated from your answers, checked by a person before it is sent. Pay what you can, including nothing.

← All technologies